Why Leveraged ETFs Secretly Destroy Long-Term Gains

Leveraged ETFs, with their siren song of amplified returns, continue to attract significant trading volume and assets under management as of mid-2025. But many traders, lured by the promise of quick riches, stumble into a minefield of risks. Chief among these is the insidious effect of volatility drag or variance drain – often misleadingly called "decay."

This isn't a product flaw; it's a mathematical certainty driven by daily compounding and market volatility. This leads to performance that can wildly diverge from what you'd intuitively expect over any period longer than a single day. Let's cut through the noise. Here’s why these instruments are financial quicksand for most long-term portfolios.

Insights

• Leveraged ETF "decay" is more accurately termed volatility drag or variance drain, reflecting how market choppiness erodes returns due to daily rebalancing.
• These products aim for a multiple of their underlying index's daily performance, not its performance over weeks, months, or years.
• Daily rebalancing, often using derivatives like swaps and futures, is the mechanism that creates this drag, especially in volatile markets.
• Higher volatility, greater leverage multiples (e.g., 3x vs. 2x), and longer holding periods all dramatically worsen this performance erosion.
• Leveraged ETFs are primarily designed for very short-term, tactical trading by sophisticated participants; they are generally unsuitable for buy-and-hold strategies. Prospectuses from issuers like ProShares and Direxion in 2025 continue to explicitly warn about holding these ETFs beyond a single trading day.

The Seductive Promise and the Hidden Cost

So, you think you’ve found a shortcut to doubling or tripling your money? Leveraged Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) whisper sweet nothings about amplifying market moves, promising to magnify your genius when you call the market right.

But there’s a nasty catch, a gremlin in the machine often referred to as "leveraged ETF decay."

A more accurate set of terms, and one that gets closer to the truth of this wealth erosion, is volatility drag or variance drain. These terms better describe how a leveraged ETF's returns over time can, and often do, significantly underperform a simple multiplication of its benchmark's performance. This gap becomes a chasm during periods of market volatility – precisely when many naive investors might be tempted to jump in or out.

Think back to the market chop we saw in parts of 2024 and early 2025. While a major index might have ended a volatile month relatively flat after a rollercoaster ride, a 2x or 3x leveraged ETF tracking it likely nursed substantial losses. This isn't bad luck; it's baked into the product's structure.

The core issue is their daily objective. A 2x leveraged ETF, for instance, is built to deliver twice the return of its underlying index for that day only. Tomorrow is a new battle, a complete reset.

The Daily Reset: How the Trap is Sprung

Each trading day, leveraged ETFs must reset their exposure to maintain that stated leverage ratio. Imagine a high-stakes poker game where the casino forces you to re-buy to a specific chip stack at the end of *every single hand*, regardless of your overall winnings or losses for the night.

That’s essentially what a leveraged ETF does. This daily rebalancing, often executed using financial derivatives like swaps, futures contracts, and other exotic instruments, is how these ETFs manage to offer, say, 200% or 300% of an index's daily move.

This constant shuffling of the deck is precisely what grinds down your returns over time, especially when the market isn't marching in a perfect, straight line. The daily adjustment achieves its short-term objective, but it plants the seeds for long-term disappointment for the unwary.

The Math That Bites: Volatility's Vicious Cycle

Let's illustrate how this path dependency plays out. Forget hypothetical, clean numbers for a moment and consider a slightly more realistic, albeit simplified, scenario based on the kind of swings we've seen in volatile sectors.

Suppose a tech-heavy index starts at 10,000 points. A 3x leveraged ETF tracking this index (similar in nature to popular products like TQQQ) also notionally starts at $100 per share.

Day 1: The index jumps 4% to 10,400. Our 3x ETF should, and does, rise 12% (3 * 4%), hitting $112.

Day 2: The index then drops 4% from its new level of 10,400. A 4% drop from 10,400 is 416 points, so the index falls to 9,984. Overall, the index is now down a mere 0.16% from its starting point (10,000 to 9,984).

What happens to our ETF? It must drop 12% (3 * 4%) from its $112 price. A 12% drop from $112 is $13.44. So, the ETF falls to $112 - $13.44 = $98.56.

Pause and look at that. The underlying index is down just 0.16%. But the 3x leveraged ETF is down 1.44% ($100 to $98.56). This isn't a fluke; it's the direct result of daily rebalancing in a volatile (up then down) market. The "path" the index took (a sharp up then a sharp down) eroded the ETF's value more than a simple 3x multiple of the index's tiny overall loss would suggest.

This isn't about bad luck. It's about path dependency. The final destination of your investment isn't just about where the index ends up, but the rollercoaster ride it took to get there. More bumps mean more damage. Compounding, usually your friend in investing, turns into a saboteur with these products when volatility reigns.

Accelerants to the Fire: What Makes Volatility Drag Worse?

Several factors act like fuel on this fire, intensifying the wealth-eroding effects of volatility drag:

Higher Leverage Multiples: This one's straightforward. A 3x leveraged ETF will generally suffer more from volatility drag than a 2x ETF tracking the same index in the same market conditions. Think of it like this: higher leverage is like pouring gasoline on the volatility fire. A 3x fund isn't just 50% more "exciting" than a 2x fund; its potential for self-destruction in choppy markets is significantly greater.

For instance, during the sideways churn of certain small-cap indexes in parts of 2024, a hypothetical 3x leveraged ETF on it would have shown substantially more value erosion—perhaps losing 10-15% more relative to its daily target compounded over a few months than a 2x equivalent—simply due to the higher leverage amplifying the effects of daily rebalancing on each minor swing.

Market Volatility: The more the market bounces around like a pinball, the worse the drag. Smooth, trending markets are less damaging (and can even, rarely, lead to outperformance, which we'll touch on). But markets characterized by sharp daily swings, even if they end up going nowhere overall, will chew away at a leveraged ETF's value.

Holding Period: The longer you hold a leveraged ETF, the more opportunity volatility drag has to compound against you. These are designed as sprinting shoes, not marathon boots. Trying to use them for a long race almost guarantees you'll end up with blisters, or worse.

The Rare Unicorn: When They *Seem* to Work

Now, someone will inevitably point to a chart where a leveraged ETF dramatically outperformed, even over a few weeks or months. Yes, in strongly trending markets with very low day-to-day volatility, leveraged ETFs can sometimes deliver returns greater than their leverage multiple times the index return. This happens when the compounding effect works in your favor due to consistent daily gains without significant reversals.

For example, if an index rose steadily by 1% every single day for 10 days, a 2x leveraged ETF might return slightly more than 20% due to the daily gains compounding on a growing base. We saw brief periods like this in certain niche technology sub-sectors in early 2025 where, for a few weeks, the trend was sharply up with minimal daily pullbacks.

But these are rare alignments of the stars. Sophisticated short-term traders, the kind who live and breathe intraday charts and algorithmic signals, might try to ride these brief waves. They know they're playing with fire and usually have iron-clad risk management, tight stop-losses, and a clear exit strategy timed in days, if not hours.

They are not "investing"; they are making a tactical bet. Relying on these unicorn scenarios for a long-term strategy is like planning your retirement around a lottery win.

Tools for Snipers, Not Grunts: Who Should Even Touch These?

These instruments were cooked up with a primary purpose in mind: to serve day traders and institutional players making very short-term directional bets or hedging complex, multi-legged positions. Their design is for surgical, intraday or few-day strikes, not for building long-term wealth in a typical investment portfolio.

If you're not prepared to monitor your position like a hawk, understand the daily reset mechanics intimately, and accept the high probability of value erosion over time due to volatility, you're simply gambling. You're bringing a knife to a gunfight you don't even realize has started.

"To invest well, you need courage and you need brains."

Warren Buffett Legendary Investor

While Mr. Buffett wasn't speaking about leveraged ETFs specifically, the wisdom applies. Courage without brains (understanding the instrument) in this arena is a fast track to financial pain.

Don't Confuse Fees with Flaws: The Real Culprit

It's easy to get sidetracked by the typically higher expense ratios of leveraged ETFs. Yes, they often cost more annually than their plain-vanilla cousins. But those fees, while a consideration, are a separate issue from the structural wealth erosion we're dissecting.

The real villain here isn't just the expense ratio or minor tracking error—which is the small day-to-day difference between the ETF's performance and its target multiple of the index due to costs or execution nuances. The big hit, the one that causes the most significant deviation from long-term expected multiples, comes from the relentless math of volatility drag or variance drain. This is a structural feature, not a fee-related bug.

The Sucker's Bet: Why Main Street Gets Burned

Countless retail investors, and anecdotal evidence alongside past surveys suggest this misunderstanding remains widespread in 2025, assume that holding a 2x leveraged S&P 500 ETF for a year where the S&P 500 gains 10% should yield them roughly 20%. Wrong. Dead wrong.

It might be 15%, it might be 5%, it might even be negative if the year was particularly choppy, even if the index ended up. The actual outcome is a lottery dependent on the path of daily returns.

Flip open the prospectus of any major leveraged ETF provider – say, ProShares or Direxion, whose 2025 filings continue these warnings – and you'll find clear statements. You'll read something to the effect of: "This Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times (3x) the daily performance of the Index.

The Fund does not seek to achieve its stated investment objective over a period of time greater than a single day." They are telling you, albeit in dense legalese, that holding it longer is a gamble not just on market direction, but critically, on a sustained low-volatility trend in that direction.

The Other Side of a Bad Coin: Inverse Products

And don't think you're safe with inverse leveraged ETFs, the ones that bet on the market going down. They suffer the exact same mathematical fate from volatility drag. These products aim to deliver the opposite of their benchmark's daily performance, multiplied by their leverage factor (e.g., -1x, -2x, -3x).

If the market whipsaws – up 2%, down 2%, up 1.5%, down 1.5% – even if it ends up significantly lower over a month, an inverse leveraged ETF can still lose you money, or make far less than you'd expect. We saw this with some inverse products tracking volatile sectors or broad market indexes during choppy periods in 2024; even when the underlying index trended down over several weeks, the daily gyrations often ate away at the inverse ETF's value due to this compounding effect on daily resets.

The Necessary Evil: Why Daily Rebalancing Persists

So, if daily rebalancing causes all this long-term pain via volatility drag, why do issuers stick with it? Because without it, the products simply couldn't function as advertised, even for a day, and could face catastrophic risks.

Imagine a 3x leveraged fund that *didn't* rebalance daily. If the underlying index dropped by, say, 20% in a single day (a black swan event, but possible), the fund would theoretically be down 60%. If it dropped by more than 33.3%, the fund would be wiped out entirely.

Daily rebalancing, by adjusting exposure through derivatives, prevents the fund's leverage from spiraling out of control (either too high or too low) and allows it to continue offering that daily leverage target. The daily reset, despite causing volatility drag, is the mechanism that keeps the lights on for these products, enabling them to meet their daily objective.

The broader ETF structure itself continues to gain traction for its efficiency and transparency in many other areas.

"Increasing confidence in the ETF structure globally is pushing ETF usage to new highs at the expense of other, more limited structures."

Eduardo Repetto Chief Investment Officer, Avantis Investors by American Century Investments

This general confidence, however, doesn't make all types of ETFs suitable for all strategies, especially when leverage and daily resets are involved.

"I see several trends playing out for the ETF market in 2025: The final catalyst is the ongoing adoption of model portfolios, where ETFs (both active and passive) remain one of the most efficient building blocks for strategists to express their portfolio views."

Noel Archard Global Head of ETFs and Portfolio Solutions, AllianceBernstein

While true for many ETFs, leveraged products require a far more nuanced understanding than standard index trackers when being considered as "building blocks."

Analysis

So, what's the big picture here? Leveraged ETFs are like financial chainsaws. In the hands of a skilled, professional lumberjack, for a very specific, short-duration task, they can be effective. In the hands of an amateur hoping to clear a forest, they're a recipe for severe injury.

The "decay," or more accurately, the variance drain or volatility drag, isn't a secret flaw deliberately hidden by issuers; it's an unavoidable mathematical consequence baked into their DNA. It's the inevitable outcome of trying to magnify daily returns in a world that rarely moves in a straight, uninterrupted line. The market's natural choppiness, its daily ebb and flow, becomes your relentless enemy when holding these products for more than a day or two.

Many retail investors get drawn in by the allure of quick, outsized gains, especially during rip-roaring bull phases or when they see specific products like TQQQ (3x Nasdaq 100) or SOXL (3x semiconductor index) making headlines with spectacular short-term returns.

For example, SOXL had periods of astonishing gains in the past, but its performance through the more mixed and volatile patches of 2024 and early 2025 highlighted its vulnerability. During these times, despite the semiconductor index itself perhaps showing resilience or even gains over certain stretches, SOXL often lagged a simple 3x multiple of that longer-term index return, precisely because the daily volatility was exacting its toll.

Investors often fail to see that stellar longer-term numbers for leveraged ETFs usually come from those rare periods of unusually strong, low-volatility trends—which are the exception, not the rule. Or, they simply misunderstand that a +50% move followed by a -33% move doesn't get you back to even when leverage is involved; you're actually down.

The industry itself, while providing the necessary warnings tucked away in lengthy prospectuses, naturally benefits from the trading volume these products generate. It's a classic case of 'caveat emptor' – buyer beware – but the 'beware' part is often drowned out by the siren song of amplified returns.

The ongoing academic and industry discussion about whether the best descriptive term is "decay," "variance drain," or "volatility drag" is interesting for finance quants, but for you, the investor, the practical result is the same: your capital is at a significantly higher risk of erosion over any extended holding period than you probably realize, especially in typical market conditions.

Final Thoughts

The bottom line? Leveraged ETFs are precision tools designed for a tiny fraction of market participants: highly sophisticated traders engaging in very short-term, tactical maneuvers, often with hedging strategies in place. For almost everyone else, especially if your investment timeframe is measured in weeks, months, or years, these products are a highly efficient way to separate you from your hard-earned money.

The relentless effect of volatility drag, a direct mathematical consequence of their daily rebalancing design, means that the longer you hold them, and the choppier the market, the more likely you are to be disappointed, or worse, financially wounded.

Understanding how these products truly behave – their strict daily targeting, their acute vulnerability to the compounding of negative returns in volatile conditions, and their inherently path-dependent nature – is not optional if you're even contemplating trading them. Don't be fooled by short-term jackpot stories or the marketing gloss.

This is one corner of the market where the house usually has a much bigger edge, not through trickery, but through the cold, hard math itself.

Did You Know?

The first leveraged ETFs were introduced in the U.S. market back in 2006. Their inherent complexity and the significant potential for investor misunderstanding regarding their risks and performance characteristics, especially over holding periods longer than a single day, have led to repeated scrutiny and cautionary statements from financial regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) over the years.

---

Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or other professional advice. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other agency, organization, employer, or company. Investing in financial markets, especially in complex instruments like leveraged ETFs, involves significant risk of loss, including the possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.